Who runs the review

A selection, carried in the order reference the way the shape already is. With one reviewer it is a statement rather than a choice, and it is already on both level pages, because what it says is that there is a name behind the work.

The project lead is contacting security professionals they know and negotiating rates, so they can take some of the work at £500 and £1,500 and eventually above. The page is worth being listed on now, which was the whole reason WD-2 came first. Adding one is adding a record to data/reviewers.yml; the frozen list in the gate moves with it, on purpose, so a reviewer cannot appear by accident.

Two of the four levels are one person's time, and the page does not say what happens if that person is unavailable. The delivery estimates are from your reply and depend on a calendar; the page explains why and stops there.

This was blocked on WD-3, which is blocked on a second name. It does not need to be: the answer for one name is a sentence, and not having it is what makes a reader at £1,500 hesitate. The reader who went to that page first, before anything else, is the reader who would buy the most. Raised by the five-reader journey of 16 September at /admin/reviews/.

Shipped in v0.2.9 as data/reviewers.yml and /who/. Built for a list on the day it had one name on it — adding the second is adding a record; the page, the twin, the register entry and the links from the level pages are generated.

Shipped in v0.2.9 at /who/dinis-cruz/. Every line read off open-source.sgit.ai's published author page and the vault catalogue, both named on the page with the date they were read. No count of years: the published record starts in 2008 and a reader can do that arithmetic and check every step of it.