---
title: Every agent needs a licence to operate
description: "Six offers, four with a price and a printed code. What is sold here is an instance: your own answers and the delta they imply, the provisions of the regulation that reach you, a person to review your situation, or an assessment by security professionals. The paid thing is not access and it is not customisation. It is independence."
lead: "**The paid thing is not access, and it is not customisation. It is independence.** The library is free and public and it stays that way. What is priced here is an **instance**: your situation, computed against it, in a vault you hold the keys to. **Four tiers, from £10 to £10,000, and two add-ons.** Two of the six do not exist yet — [they say so on their own row](/offers/), because a store that edits its gaps out is a marketing page wearing a lab coat."
order: 1
toc: true
---

## The four, and the two

{{offers}}

## What the ladder is actually for

A buyer moving up this ladder is not buying more access, and not buying a
customised version of a thing everybody else has. **They are buying independence
from us.**

At £10 you answer questions and keep the file. At £50 you get a vault you hold
the keys to, that you can clone, and that we can be removed from. At £150 a person
reads your situation with you. At £5,000 a team does. The direction of travel is
the same at every rung: **more of the result is yours, and less of it depends on
us still being here.**

That is why the free public library is not on this page and is not for sale. The
library belongs to the registry and it is free {{claim:graph-nodes}}. **Every paid
thing here is an instance.** The line between the two is the argument the platform
publishes, and a checkout does not move it.

## What is true of each of these today

**Two of the six do not exist yet.** They are on the page because the pack that
specified this store lists them, and listing a thing that does not exist is only
dishonest if you take the price.

- The **signed-opinion add-on has no wording**, and wording has to exist before a first signature. It has no code behind it and it cannot be bought. {{claim:opinion-wording-absent}}
- The **multi-format add-on's generator runs**, but the check that proves every variant carries the same facts does not. **That check is the whole guarantee**, it is mechanically checkable, and until it is built the guarantee is not printed here. {{claim:fact-diff-absent}}
- **Tier 1's application was built in August and has not been located.** Until it is found, tier 1 is a questions page and this site does not promise more. {{claim:t1-app-not-located}}
- **Tier 2's graph exists at 1,523 nodes with amendments applied. The pipeline does not exist.** {{claim:t2-pipeline-absent}}
- **Tier 4's seven-role team is specified and has never run.** A first buyer would be the first run, and the conversation says so before the deposit, not after it. {{claim:t4-team-never-run}}

Every one of those sentences is in [the ledger](/ledger/) with the state it
earned. None of them is softened anywhere on this site, and a build check holds
that line.

## How paying works, in one paragraph

**Four codes, one per tier, each a payment link with a printed code beside it.**
A payment link is an online payment, so no cross-border rule applies to it — which
matters, because a United Kingdom card account cannot tap in Portugal and the
provider says so in those words. **No card reader was bought.**
{{claim:card-reader-refused}} Above about a thousand pounds a card stops making
sense, so [tier 4](/d/t4/) goes by invoice and bank transfer, or through the cloud
marketplace after a conversation. **The two rails never appear as a choice on one
transaction**, and [the paying page](/paying/) explains why that is a rule rather
than a preference. {{claim:marketplace-no-customer-payment}}

## Who this is for

**In this order, because this is the order of the opportunity** — not because the
three are equally served. [The full routing is here](/audiences/).

1. **The corporate user** assessing an agent they already run. The market anchors between eight and one hundred and fifty thousand dollars and nothing sits underneath it.
2. **The investor** buying a signed review of a company they are backing. No productised, affordable, signed investor security review exists at any price, and every component of one is already written.
3. **The founder**, and only as the reverse sale: telling a founder what diligence will find, before it runs. Two funded incumbents and a free tier sit under everything else here, and both already publish the answer.

## What this site will not tell you

Nothing here is a compliance assessment, and nothing here is a mark of conformity
to a standard. Neither describes this, and the language of conformity marking
appears on no deliverable and on no page. **The company issues every
opinion**, with an express non-assumption of personal responsibility on its face,
and **the person who sells is never the person who signs.**

Outputs are model generated and marked as such {{claim:transparency-article}}.
Findings are triaged, never raw: recall-optimised agents run at 0.388 precision,
which is about three findings in five wrong, so **every finding that reaches you
has been reproduced rather than reviewed** {{claim:precision-0388}}.

And one sentence that a reader might expect on a page like this **is not here on
purpose**: we do not tell you what we can and cannot read, because six questions
about what leaks have not been answered yet. [The disclosures page says which six](/disclosures/).
{{claim:cannot-read-unanswered}}

---

This document is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).